Skip to main content

Keilor East vs Queenscliff

Property investment comparison - Keilor East, VIC 3033 vs Queenscliff, VIC 3225

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keilor East wins 5, Queenscliff wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKeilor EastQueenscliff
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$710K$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.84%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%3.77%
1-year house growth+10.8%-9.7%estimate
3-year house growth+15.4%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.7%
Population15,0781,516

Keilor East vs Queenscliff: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Keilor East and $1.1M in Queenscliff, so Keilor East is the cheaper entry point, with Queenscliff houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Keilor East sits at a median of $710K against $740K in Queenscliff, which makes Keilor East the more affordable unit market and Queenscliff the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Keilor East and -9.7% in Queenscliff (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Keilor East, while Queenscliff went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keilor East and 1.7% in Queenscliff, so landlords in Keilor East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Keilor East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,078 against 1,516, roughly 10 times the size of Queenscliff; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Keilor East for a lower purchase price, Keilor East for recent price momentum, Keilor East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison