Keilor East vs Rose River
Property investment comparison - Keilor East, VIC 3033 vs Rose River, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keilor East wins 2, Rose River wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Keilor East | Rose River |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $710K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.84% | 3.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +15.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 3.1% |
| Population | 15,078 | 26 |
Keilor East vs Rose River: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Keilor East and $1.2M in Rose River, so Keilor East is the cheaper entry point, with Rose River houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Rose River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.84% in Keilor East, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keilor East and 3.1% in Rose River, so landlords in Keilor East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Keilor East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,078 against 26, roughly 580 times the size of Rose River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rose River for rental income, Keilor East for a lower purchase price, Keilor East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison