Skip to main content

Keilor East vs Tarrengower

Property investment comparison - Keilor East, VIC 3033 vs Tarrengower, VIC 3463

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keilor East wins 4, Tarrengower wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKeilor EastTarrengower
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$710K$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.84%2.49%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%1.86%
1-year house growth+10.8%-
3-year house growth+15.4%-
Vacancy rate0.8%3.5%
Population15,07856

Keilor East vs Tarrengower: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Keilor East and $1.1M in Tarrengower, so Tarrengower is the cheaper entry point, with Keilor East houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Keilor East sits at a median of $710K against $825K in Tarrengower, which makes Keilor East the more affordable unit market and Tarrengower the pricier one.

On cash flow, Keilor East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.84%, compared with 2.49% in Tarrengower, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keilor East and 3.5% in Tarrengower, so landlords in Keilor East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Keilor East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,078 against 56, roughly 269 times the size of Tarrengower; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Keilor East for rental income, Tarrengower for a lower purchase price, Keilor East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison