Skip to main content

Keilor vs Whitelaw

Property investment comparison - Keilor, VIC 3036 vs Whitelaw, VIC 3950

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keilor wins 1, Whitelaw wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKeilorWhitelaw
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$670K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.91%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.02%4.27%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.5%
Population5,90630

Keilor vs Whitelaw: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Keilor and $1.2M in Whitelaw.

For units, Keilor sits at a median of $670K against $460K in Whitelaw, which makes Whitelaw the more affordable unit market and Keilor the pricier one.

On cash flow, Keilor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.91%, compared with 2.45% in Whitelaw, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Whitelaw and 1.5% in Keilor, so landlords in Whitelaw face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Keilor is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,906 against 30, roughly 197 times the size of Whitelaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Keilor for rental income, Whitelaw for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison