Skip to main content

Kembla Heights vs Paterson

Property investment comparison - Kembla Heights, NSW 2526 vs Paterson, NSW 2421

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kembla Heights wins 2, Paterson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKembla HeightsPaterson
Median house price$945K$950K
Median unit price$755K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.56%
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%3.78%
1-year house growth--2.7%
3-year house growth-+10.7%
Vacancy rate7.4%1.6%
Population88960

Kembla Heights vs Paterson: what the numbers say

The median house price is $945K in Kembla Heights and $950K in Paterson, so Kembla Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Paterson houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Kembla Heights sits at a median of $755K against $465K in Paterson, which makes Paterson the more affordable unit market and Kembla Heights the pricier one.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Paterson and 7.4% in Kembla Heights, so landlords in Paterson face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Paterson is the bigger suburb, with a population of 960 against 88, roughly 11 times the size of Kembla Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kembla Heights for a lower purchase price, Paterson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison