Kembla Heights vs Wyongah
Property investment comparison - Kembla Heights, NSW 2526 vs Wyongah, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kembla Heights wins 1, Wyongah wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kembla Heights | Wyongah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $945K | $945K |
| Median unit price | $755K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.86% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.52% | 4.46% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +14.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 7.4% | 2.5% |
| Population | 88 | 2,020 |
Kembla Heights vs Wyongah: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $945K in Kembla Heights and $945K in Wyongah.
Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Wyongah and 7.4% in Kembla Heights, so landlords in Wyongah face less competition for tenants.
Wyongah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,020 against 88, roughly 23 times the size of Kembla Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wyongah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Kembla Heights, NSW 2526
Open Kembla Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Kembla Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison