Skip to main content

Kenilworth vs Walloon

Property investment comparison - Kenilworth, QLD 4574 vs Walloon, QLD 4306

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kenilworth wins 2, Walloon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKenilworthWalloon
Median house price$875K$875K
Median unit price$265K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.15%3.77%
Gross rental yield (units)4.61%4.94%
1-year house growth+19.9%+21.3%estimate
3-year house growth-13.8%-
Vacancy rate1.3%1.7%
Population6042,305

Kenilworth vs Walloon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $875K in Kenilworth and $875K in Walloon.

For units, Kenilworth sits at a median of $265K against $560K in Walloon, which makes Kenilworth the more affordable unit market and Walloon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Walloon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.77%, compared with 3.15% in Kenilworth, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.9% in Kenilworth and +21.3% in Walloon (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Walloon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Kenilworth and 1.7% in Walloon, so landlords in Kenilworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Walloon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,305 against 604, roughly 3.8 times the size of Kenilworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Walloon for rental income, Walloon for recent price momentum, Kenilworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison