Kensington vs Putney
Property investment comparison - Kensington, NSW 2033 vs Putney, NSW 2112
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kensington wins 4, Putney wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kensington | Putney |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.5M | $3.5M |
| Median unit price | $960K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.25% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.47% | 2.74% |
| 1-year house growth | -4.3% | -6.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -11.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 3.0% |
| Population | 11,927 | 4,097 |
Kensington vs Putney: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.5M in Kensington and $3.5M in Putney, so Kensington is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved -4.3% in Kensington and -6.1% in Putney (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kensington, while Putney went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Kensington and 3.0% in Putney, so landlords in Kensington face less competition for tenants.
Kensington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,927 against 4,097, roughly 2.9 times the size of Putney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kensington for a lower purchase price, Kensington for recent price momentum, Kensington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison