Kensington Park vs Lonsdale
Property investment comparison - Kensington Park, SA 5068 vs Lonsdale, SA 5160
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kensington Park wins 1, Lonsdale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kensington Park | Lonsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.9M | $2.6M |
| Median unit price | $790K | $460K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.61% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +52.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 2,627 | 23 |
Kensington Park vs Lonsdale: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.9M in Kensington Park and $2.6M in Lonsdale, so Kensington Park is the cheaper entry point, with Lonsdale houses about 38% dearer.
For units, Kensington Park sits at a median of $790K against $460K in Lonsdale, which makes Lonsdale the more affordable unit market and Kensington Park the pricier one.
Kensington Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,627 against 23, roughly 114 times the size of Lonsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kensington Park for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Kensington Park, SA 5068
Open Kensington Park suburb profileRecent sales in Kensington Park
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison