Keperra vs Mon Repos
Property investment comparison - Keperra, QLD 4054 vs Mon Repos, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keperra wins 1, Mon Repos wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Keperra | Mon Repos |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $585K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.06% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +15.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +50.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| Population | 7,014 | 24 |
Keperra vs Mon Repos: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Keperra and $1.2M in Mon Repos.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keperra and 1.2% in Mon Repos, so landlords in Keperra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Keperra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,014 against 24, roughly 292 times the size of Mon Repos; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Keperra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison