Skip to main content

Keperra vs Oxenford

Property investment comparison - Keperra, QLD 4054 vs Oxenford, QLD 4210

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keperra wins 3, Oxenford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKeperraOxenford
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.06%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.67%
1-year house growth+15.0%+14.4%
3-year house growth+50.8%+48.4%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.7%
Population7,01412,273

Keperra vs Oxenford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Keperra and $1.2M in Oxenford, so Oxenford is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.0% in Keperra and +14.4% in Oxenford, so recent momentum favours Keperra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Keperra houses are +50.8% and Oxenford houses +48.4%, so Keperra has compounded faster than Oxenford over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keperra and 1.7% in Oxenford, so landlords in Keperra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxenford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,273 against 7,014, larger than Keperra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxenford for a lower purchase price, Keperra for recent price momentum, Keperra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison