Skip to main content

Kepnock vs Laidley North

Property investment comparison - Kepnock, QLD 4670 vs Laidley North, QLD 4341

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kepnock wins 2, Laidley North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKepnockLaidley North
Median house price$675K$675K
Median unit price-$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.67%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.56%
1-year house growth+16.6%+17.6%
3-year house growth+60.4%+67.4%
Vacancy rate2.0%2.6%
Population4,501593

Kepnock vs Laidley North: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $675K in Kepnock and $675K in Laidley North.

On cash flow, Kepnock leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 4.50% in Laidley North, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Kepnock and +17.6% in Laidley North, so recent momentum favours Laidley North, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kepnock houses are +60.4% and Laidley North houses +67.4%, so Laidley North has compounded faster than Kepnock over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Kepnock and 2.6% in Laidley North, so landlords in Kepnock face less competition for tenants.

Kepnock is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,501 against 593, roughly 8 times the size of Laidley North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kepnock for rental income, Laidley North for recent price momentum, Kepnock for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison