Kerang vs Loddon Vale
Property investment comparison - Kerang, VIC 3579 vs Loddon Vale, VIC 3575
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kerang wins 2, Loddon Vale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kerang | Loddon Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $330K | $325K |
| Median unit price | $220K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.84% | 3.21% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.20% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,960 | 24 |
Kerang vs Loddon Vale: what the numbers say
The median house price is $330K in Kerang and $325K in Loddon Vale, so Loddon Vale is the cheaper entry point, with Kerang houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Kerang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.84%, compared with 3.21% in Loddon Vale, a gap of 2.63 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Kerang and 1.1% in Loddon Vale, so landlords in Kerang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 24, roughly 165 times the size of Loddon Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kerang for rental income, Loddon Vale for a lower purchase price, Kerang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison