Kerang vs McLoughlins Beach
Property investment comparison - Kerang, VIC 3579 vs McLoughlins Beach, VIC 3874
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kerang wins 3, McLoughlins Beach wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kerang | McLoughlins Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $330K | $335K |
| Median unit price | $220K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.84% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.20% | 5.12% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | - |
| Population | 3,960 | 121 |
Kerang vs McLoughlins Beach: what the numbers say
The median house price is $330K in Kerang and $335K in McLoughlins Beach, so Kerang is the cheaper entry point, with McLoughlins Beach houses about 2% dearer.
For units, Kerang sits at a median of $220K against $395K in McLoughlins Beach, which makes Kerang the more affordable unit market and McLoughlins Beach the pricier one.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 121, roughly 33 times the size of McLoughlins Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kerang for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
McLoughlins Beach, VIC 3874
Open McLoughlins Beach suburb profileRecent sales in McLoughlins Beach
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison