Kerang vs Wallup
Property investment comparison - Kerang, VIC 3579 vs Wallup, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kerang wins 0, Wallup wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kerang | Wallup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $330K | $330K |
| Median unit price | $220K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.84% | 5.91% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.20% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | - |
| Population | 3,960 | 28 |
Kerang vs Wallup: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $330K in Kerang and $330K in Wallup.
On cash flow, Wallup leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.91%, compared with 5.84% in Kerang, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.
Kerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,960 against 28, roughly 141 times the size of Wallup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wallup for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison