Kew vs Lynwood
Property investment comparison - Kew, NSW 2439 vs Lynwood, NSW 2477
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kew wins 1, Lynwood wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kew | Lynwood |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $1M |
| Median unit price | $685K | $645K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.43% | 2.25% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.65% | 5.52% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +9.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 0.3% |
| Population | 1,761 | 215 |
Kew vs Lynwood: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Kew and $1M in Lynwood.
For units, Kew sits at a median of $685K against $645K in Lynwood, which makes Lynwood the more affordable unit market and Kew the pricier one.
On cash flow, Kew leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.43%, compared with 2.25% in Lynwood, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Lynwood and 2.3% in Kew, so landlords in Lynwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kew is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,761 against 215, roughly 8 times the size of Lynwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kew for rental income, Lynwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison