Kew vs Stonehaven
Property investment comparison - Kew, VIC 3101 vs Stonehaven, VIC 3218
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kew wins 2, Stonehaven wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kew | Stonehaven |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.7M |
| Median unit price | $850K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.35% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.05% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -3.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -9.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 2.9% |
| Population | 24,499 | 79 |
Kew vs Stonehaven: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Kew and $2.7M in Stonehaven, so Kew is the cheaper entry point, with Stonehaven houses about 5% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kew and 2.9% in Stonehaven, so landlords in Kew face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kew is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,499 against 79, roughly 310 times the size of Stonehaven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kew for a lower purchase price, Kew for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison