Skip to main content

Kew vs Sutherlands Creek

Property investment comparison - Kew, VIC 3101 vs Sutherlands Creek, VIC 3331

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kew wins 2, Sutherlands Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKewSutherlands Creek
Median house price$2.5M$2.6M
Median unit price$850K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.35%1.11%
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%-
1-year house growth-3.4%-
3-year house growth-9.3%-
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population24,499129

Kew vs Sutherlands Creek: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Kew and $2.6M in Sutherlands Creek, so Kew is the cheaper entry point, with Sutherlands Creek houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Kew leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.35%, compared with 1.11% in Sutherlands Creek, a gap of 1.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Sutherlands Creek and 1.6% in Kew, so landlords in Sutherlands Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kew is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,499 against 129, roughly 190 times the size of Sutherlands Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kew for rental income, Kew for a lower purchase price, Sutherlands Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison