Killara vs Panmure
Property investment comparison - Killara, VIC 3691 vs Panmure, VIC 3265
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Killara wins 1, Panmure wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Killara | Panmure |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $775K | $775K |
| Median unit price | $445K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 2.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.06% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.3% | 2.8% |
| Population | 1,485 | 442 |
Killara vs Panmure: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $775K in Killara and $775K in Panmure.
On cash flow, Killara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 2.78% in Panmure, a gap of 1.42 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.8% in Panmure and 3.3% in Killara, so landlords in Panmure face less competition for tenants.
Killara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,485 against 442, roughly 3.4 times the size of Panmure; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Killara for rental income, Panmure for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison