Killara vs Yeo
Property investment comparison - Killara, VIC 3691 vs Yeo, VIC 3249
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Killara wins 1, Yeo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Killara | Yeo |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $775K | $770K |
| Median unit price | $445K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 3.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.06% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.3% | 0.8% |
| Population | 1,485 | 124 |
Killara vs Yeo: what the numbers say
The median house price is $775K in Killara and $770K in Yeo, so Yeo is the cheaper entry point, with Killara houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Killara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.20% in Yeo, a gap of 1.00 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Yeo and 3.3% in Killara, so landlords in Yeo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Killara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,485 against 124, roughly 12 times the size of Yeo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Killara for rental income, Yeo for a lower purchase price, Yeo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison