Skip to main content

Kilsyth vs Woodvale

Property investment comparison - Kilsyth, VIC 3137 vs Woodvale, VIC 3556

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kilsyth wins 3, Woodvale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKilsythWoodvale
Median house price$875K$875K
Median unit price$740K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.86%2.51%
Gross rental yield (units)4.45%3.96%
1-year house growth+4.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%7.3%
Population11,699556

Kilsyth vs Woodvale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $875K in Kilsyth and $875K in Woodvale.

For units, Kilsyth sits at a median of $740K against $665K in Woodvale, which makes Woodvale the more affordable unit market and Kilsyth the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kilsyth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 2.51% in Woodvale, a gap of 1.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Kilsyth and 7.3% in Woodvale, so landlords in Kilsyth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kilsyth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,699 against 556, roughly 21 times the size of Woodvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kilsyth for rental income, Kilsyth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison