Skip to main content

Kimbolton vs Rye

Property investment comparison - Kimbolton, VIC 3551 vs Rye, VIC 3941

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kimbolton wins 4, Rye wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKimboltonRye
Median house price$945K$950K
Median unit price$490K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.11%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%4.50%
1-year house growth--5.1%
3-year house growth--15.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.7%
Population969,438

Kimbolton vs Rye: what the numbers say

The median house price is $945K in Kimbolton and $950K in Rye, so Kimbolton is the cheaper entry point, with Rye houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Kimbolton sits at a median of $490K against $585K in Rye, which makes Kimbolton the more affordable unit market and Rye the pricier one.

On cash flow, Rye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.11% in Kimbolton, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Kimbolton and 1.7% in Rye, so landlords in Kimbolton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,438 against 96, roughly 98 times the size of Kimbolton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rye for rental income, Kimbolton for a lower purchase price, Kimbolton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison