Skip to main content

Kimbolton vs Springvale

Property investment comparison - Kimbolton, VIC 3551 vs Springvale, VIC 3171

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kimbolton wins 3, Springvale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKimboltonSpringvale
Median house price$945K$945K
Median unit price$490K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.11%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.52%4.31%
1-year house growth-+7.7%
3-year house growth-+8.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.1%
Population9622,174

Kimbolton vs Springvale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $945K in Kimbolton and $945K in Springvale.

For units, Kimbolton sits at a median of $490K against $630K in Springvale, which makes Kimbolton the more affordable unit market and Springvale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Springvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 3.11% in Kimbolton, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Kimbolton and 1.1% in Springvale, so landlords in Kimbolton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Springvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,174 against 96, roughly 231 times the size of Kimbolton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Springvale for rental income, Kimbolton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison