Skip to main content

King Valley vs St Albans Park

Property investment comparison - King Valley, VIC 3678 vs St Albans Park, VIC 3219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: King Valley wins 1, St Albans Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKing ValleySt Albans Park
Median house price$700K$700K
Median unit price-$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.54%3.89%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.20%
1-year house growth-+13.1%
3-year house growth-+19.8%
Vacancy rate3.2%0.9%
Population874,942

King Valley vs St Albans Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in King Valley and $700K in St Albans Park.

On cash flow, King Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.54%, compared with 3.89% in St Albans Park, a gap of 1.65 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in St Albans Park and 3.2% in King Valley, so landlords in St Albans Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Albans Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,942 against 87, roughly 57 times the size of King Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: King Valley for rental income, St Albans Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison