Skip to main content

Kings Park vs Renwick

Property investment comparison - Kings Park, NSW 2148 vs Renwick, NSW 2575

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kings Park wins 2, Renwick wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKings ParkRenwick
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$685K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.62%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.88%
1-year house growth+7.7%-0.7%
3-year house growth+12.8%+5.1%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population3,4761,453

Kings Park vs Renwick: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Kings Park and $1.3M in Renwick.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Kings Park and -0.7% in Renwick, so recent momentum favours Kings Park, while Renwick went backwards.

Looking back three years, Kings Park houses are +12.8% and Renwick houses +5.1%, so Kings Park has compounded faster than Renwick over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Renwick and 1.6% in Kings Park, so landlords in Renwick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kings Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,476 against 1,453, roughly 2.4 times the size of Renwick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kings Park for recent price momentum, Renwick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison