Kingsley vs Palmyra
Property investment comparison - Kingsley, WA 6026 vs Palmyra, WA 6157
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingsley wins 1, Palmyra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kingsley | Palmyra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $510K | $770K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.40% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.60% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +22.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +56.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Population | 13,204 | 7,585 |
Kingsley vs Palmyra: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Kingsley and $1.3M in Palmyra, so Palmyra is the cheaper entry point, with Kingsley houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Kingsley sits at a median of $510K against $770K in Palmyra, which makes Kingsley the more affordable unit market and Palmyra the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.5%.
Kingsley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,204 against 7,585, larger than Palmyra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Palmyra for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison