Skip to main content

Kingsthorpe vs Ooralea

Property investment comparison - Kingsthorpe, QLD 4400 vs Ooralea, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingsthorpe wins 3, Ooralea wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKingsthorpeOoralea
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price$215K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)-7.01%
1-year house growth+16.3%+11.3%estimate
3-year house growth+41.8%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.8%
Population2,1593,691

Kingsthorpe vs Ooralea: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Kingsthorpe and $750K in Ooralea.

For units, Kingsthorpe sits at a median of $215K against $450K in Ooralea, which makes Kingsthorpe the more affordable unit market and Ooralea the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.3% in Kingsthorpe and +11.3% in Ooralea (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kingsthorpe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kingsthorpe and 2.8% in Ooralea, so landlords in Kingsthorpe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ooralea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,691 against 2,159, larger than Kingsthorpe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kingsthorpe for recent price momentum, Kingsthorpe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison