Skip to main content

Kingston Beach vs Lewisham

Property investment comparison - Kingston Beach, TAS 7050 vs Lewisham, TAS 7173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingston Beach wins 2, Lewisham wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKingston BeachLewisham
Median house price$945K$935K
Median unit price$640K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%2.47%
1-year house growth+3.6%estimate+14.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%4.7%
Population2,305799

Kingston Beach vs Lewisham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $945K in Kingston Beach and $935K in Lewisham, so Lewisham is the cheaper entry point, with Kingston Beach houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Kingston Beach sits at a median of $640K against $620K in Lewisham, which makes Lewisham the more affordable unit market and Kingston Beach the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.6% in Kingston Beach (an estimate) and +14.6% in Lewisham (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lewisham, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Kingston Beach and 4.7% in Lewisham, so landlords in Kingston Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kingston Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,305 against 799, roughly 2.9 times the size of Lewisham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lewisham for a lower purchase price, Lewisham for recent price momentum, Kingston Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison