Skip to main content

Kingston Beach vs Taroona

Property investment comparison - Kingston Beach, TAS 7050 vs Taroona, TAS 7053

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingston Beach wins 5, Taroona wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKingston BeachTaroona
Median house price$945K$950K
Median unit price$640K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%1.93%
1-year house growth+3.6%estimate+1.8%
3-year house growth--4.0%
Vacancy rate1.0%2.3%
Population2,3053,121

Kingston Beach vs Taroona: what the numbers say

The median house price is $945K in Kingston Beach and $950K in Taroona, so Kingston Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Taroona houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Kingston Beach sits at a median of $640K against $1.2M in Taroona, which makes Kingston Beach the more affordable unit market and Taroona the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.6% in Kingston Beach (an estimate) and +1.8% in Taroona, so recent momentum favours Kingston Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Kingston Beach and 2.3% in Taroona, so landlords in Kingston Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taroona is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,121 against 2,305, larger than Kingston Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kingston Beach for a lower purchase price, Kingston Beach for recent price momentum, Kingston Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison