Kingsville vs Rose River
Property investment comparison - Kingsville, VIC 3012 vs Rose River, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingsville wins 2, Rose River wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kingsville | Rose River |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 3.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.05% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -3.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 3.1% |
| Population | 3,920 | 26 |
Kingsville vs Rose River: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Kingsville and $1.2M in Rose River, so Kingsville is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Rose River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 3.30% in Kingsville, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kingsville and 3.1% in Rose River, so landlords in Kingsville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kingsville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,920 against 26, roughly 151 times the size of Rose River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rose River for rental income, Kingsville for a lower purchase price, Kingsville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison