Skip to main content

Kingsville vs Wantirna

Property investment comparison - Kingsville, VIC 3012 vs Wantirna, VIC 3152

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingsville wins 2, Wantirna wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKingsvilleWantirna
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.05%4.30%
1-year house growth-3.5%estimate-0.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%2.5%
Population3,92014,237

Kingsville vs Wantirna: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Kingsville and $1.1M in Wantirna, so Wantirna is the cheaper entry point, with Kingsville houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.5% in Kingsville (an estimate) and -0.7% in Wantirna (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wantirna, while Kingsville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kingsville and 2.5% in Wantirna, so landlords in Kingsville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wantirna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,237 against 3,920, roughly 3.6 times the size of Kingsville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wantirna for a lower purchase price, Wantirna for recent price momentum, Kingsville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison