Skip to main content

Kirwan vs Pimlico

Property investment comparison - Kirwan, QLD 4817 vs Pimlico, QLD 4812

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kirwan wins 0, Pimlico wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKirwanPimlico
Median house price$660K$660K
Median unit price-$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.94%5.50%
1-year house growth+14.6%+16.0%
3-year house growth+68.8%+80.2%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population20,7802,557

Kirwan vs Pimlico: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $660K in Kirwan and $660K in Pimlico.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.6% in Kirwan and +16.0% in Pimlico, so recent momentum favours Pimlico, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kirwan houses are +68.8% and Pimlico houses +80.2%, so Pimlico has compounded faster than Kirwan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Pimlico and 1.4% in Kirwan, so landlords in Pimlico face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kirwan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,780 against 2,557, roughly 8 times the size of Pimlico; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pimlico for recent price momentum, Pimlico for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison