Skip to main content

Klemzig vs Macclesfield

Property investment comparison - Klemzig, SA 5087 vs Macclesfield, SA 5153

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Klemzig wins 4, Macclesfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKlemzigMacclesfield
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$530K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.00%
1-year house growth+13.0%+10.6%
3-year house growth+40.0%+44.9%
Vacancy rate0.7%2.1%
Population6,7131,413

Klemzig vs Macclesfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Klemzig and $1.1M in Macclesfield, so Klemzig is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Klemzig sits at a median of $530K against $750K in Macclesfield, which makes Klemzig the more affordable unit market and Macclesfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.0% in Klemzig and +10.6% in Macclesfield, so recent momentum favours Klemzig, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Klemzig houses are +40.0% and Macclesfield houses +44.9%, so Macclesfield has compounded faster than Klemzig over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Klemzig and 2.1% in Macclesfield, so landlords in Klemzig face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Klemzig is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,713 against 1,413, roughly 4.8 times the size of Macclesfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Klemzig for a lower purchase price, Klemzig for recent price momentum, Klemzig for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison