Skip to main content

Klemzig vs Port Elliot

Property investment comparison - Klemzig, SA 5087 vs Port Elliot, SA 5212

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Klemzig wins 4, Port Elliot wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKlemzigPort Elliot
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$530K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.67%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.49%
1-year house growth+13.0%+6.3%
3-year house growth+40.0%+32.0%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.0%
Population6,7132,251

Klemzig vs Port Elliot: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Klemzig and $1.1M in Port Elliot, so Port Elliot is the cheaper entry point, with Klemzig houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Klemzig sits at a median of $530K against $670K in Port Elliot, which makes Klemzig the more affordable unit market and Port Elliot the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.0% in Klemzig and +6.3% in Port Elliot, so recent momentum favours Klemzig, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Klemzig houses are +40.0% and Port Elliot houses +32.0%, so Klemzig has compounded faster than Port Elliot over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Klemzig and 1.0% in Port Elliot, so landlords in Klemzig face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Klemzig is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,713 against 2,251, roughly 3.0 times the size of Port Elliot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Port Elliot for a lower purchase price, Klemzig for recent price momentum, Klemzig for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison