Kolora vs Kurunjang
Property investment comparison - Kolora, VIC 3265 vs Kurunjang, VIC 3337
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kolora wins 1, Kurunjang wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kolora | Kurunjang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | $620K |
| Median unit price | $245K | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.37% | 3.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.63% | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.8% | 2.4% |
| Population | 188 | 10,711 |
Kolora vs Kurunjang: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Kolora and $620K in Kurunjang.
For units, Kolora sits at a median of $245K against $450K in Kurunjang, which makes Kolora the more affordable unit market and Kurunjang the pricier one.
On cash flow, Kurunjang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.64%, compared with 3.37% in Kolora, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Kurunjang and 3.8% in Kolora, so landlords in Kurunjang face less competition for tenants.
Kurunjang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,711 against 188, roughly 57 times the size of Kolora; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kurunjang for rental income, Kurunjang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison