Koorooman vs Montmorency
Property investment comparison - Koorooman, VIC 3953 vs Montmorency, VIC 3094
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Koorooman wins 2, Montmorency wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Koorooman | Montmorency |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $775K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.21% | 3.18% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.86% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.1% |
| Population | 115 | 9,250 |
Koorooman vs Montmorency: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Koorooman and $1.2M in Montmorency, so Koorooman is the cheaper entry point, with Montmorency houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Montmorency leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.18%, compared with 2.21% in Koorooman, a gap of 0.97 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Koorooman and 1.1% in Montmorency, so landlords in Koorooman face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Montmorency is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,250 against 115, roughly 80 times the size of Koorooman; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Montmorency for rental income, Koorooman for a lower purchase price, Koorooman for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison