Korumburra vs Moutajup
Property investment comparison - Korumburra, VIC 3950 vs Moutajup, VIC 3294
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Korumburra wins 2, Moutajup wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Korumburra | Moutajup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | $620K |
| Median unit price | $450K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.35% | 3.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Population | 4,749 | 108 |
Korumburra vs Moutajup: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Korumburra and $620K in Moutajup.
On cash flow, Korumburra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.35%, compared with 3.01% in Moutajup, a gap of 1.34 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.7%.
Korumburra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,749 against 108, roughly 44 times the size of Moutajup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Korumburra for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison