Kotta vs Warragul
Property investment comparison - Kotta, VIC 3565 vs Warragul, VIC 3820
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kotta wins 1, Warragul wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kotta | Warragul |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $690K | $695K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.49% | 4.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +4.7% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.9% |
| Population | 134 | 19,856 |
Kotta vs Warragul: what the numbers say
The median house price is $690K in Kotta and $695K in Warragul, so Kotta is the cheaper entry point, with Warragul houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Warragul leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 2.49% in Kotta, a gap of 2.01 percentage points.
Warragul is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,856 against 134, roughly 148 times the size of Kotta; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warragul for rental income, Kotta for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison