Koyuga vs Rhyll
Property investment comparison - Koyuga, VIC 3622 vs Rhyll, VIC 3923
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Koyuga wins 1, Rhyll wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Koyuga | Rhyll |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $790K | $790K |
| Median unit price | $445K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | 2.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.55% | 5.30% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +3.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 3.8% |
| Population | 355 | 836 |
Koyuga vs Rhyll: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $790K in Koyuga and $790K in Rhyll.
On cash flow, Koyuga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.99% in Rhyll, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.
Rhyll is the bigger suburb, with a population of 836 against 355, roughly 2.4 times the size of Koyuga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Koyuga for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison