Koyuga vs Strathfieldsaye
Property investment comparison - Koyuga, VIC 3622 vs Strathfieldsaye, VIC 3551
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Koyuga wins 1, Strathfieldsaye wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Koyuga | Strathfieldsaye |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $790K | $790K |
| Median unit price | $445K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.55% | 4.50% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.9% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.9% |
| Population | 355 | 6,850 |
Koyuga vs Strathfieldsaye: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $790K in Koyuga and $790K in Strathfieldsaye.
On cash flow, Strathfieldsaye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.10% in Koyuga, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.
Strathfieldsaye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,850 against 355, roughly 19 times the size of Koyuga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Strathfieldsaye for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Strathfieldsaye, VIC 3551
Open Strathfieldsaye suburb profileRecent sales in Strathfieldsaye
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison