Skip to main content

Kurunjang vs Winter Valley

Property investment comparison - Kurunjang, VIC 3337 vs Winter Valley, VIC 3358

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kurunjang wins 5, Winter Valley wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKurunjangWinter Valley
Median house price$620K$620K
Median unit price$450K$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.64%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%3.01%
1-year house growth+12.8%+10.7%
3-year house growth+18.3%+3.4%
Vacancy rate2.4%8.1%
Population10,7113,440

Kurunjang vs Winter Valley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Kurunjang and $620K in Winter Valley.

For units, Kurunjang sits at a median of $450K against $565K in Winter Valley, which makes Kurunjang the more affordable unit market and Winter Valley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.8% in Kurunjang and +10.7% in Winter Valley, so recent momentum favours Kurunjang, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kurunjang houses are +18.3% and Winter Valley houses +3.4%, so Kurunjang has compounded faster than Winter Valley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Kurunjang and 8.1% in Winter Valley, so landlords in Kurunjang face less competition for tenants.

Kurunjang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,711 against 3,440, roughly 3.1 times the size of Winter Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kurunjang for recent price momentum, Kurunjang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison