Skip to main content

Kyeemagh vs Westmead

Property investment comparison - Kyeemagh, NSW 2216 vs Westmead, NSW 2145

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kyeemagh wins 0, Westmead wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKyeemaghWestmead
Median house price$2M$2M
Median unit price$765K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)5.27%5.63%
1-year house growth-4.7%estimate+1.7%
3-year house growth-+7.5%
Vacancy rate3.8%1.0%
Population93516,555

Kyeemagh vs Westmead: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2M in Kyeemagh and $2M in Westmead.

For units, Kyeemagh sits at a median of $765K against $600K in Westmead, which makes Westmead the more affordable unit market and Kyeemagh the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.7% in Kyeemagh (an estimate) and +1.7% in Westmead, so recent momentum favours Westmead, while Kyeemagh went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Westmead and 3.8% in Kyeemagh, so landlords in Westmead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Westmead is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,555 against 935, roughly 18 times the size of Kyeemagh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Westmead for recent price momentum, Westmead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison