Skip to main content

La Perouse vs Lane Cove

Property investment comparison - La Perouse, NSW 2036 vs Lane Cove, NSW 2066

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: La Perouse wins 2, Lane Cove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLa PerouseLane Cove
Median house price$3.2M$3.2M
Median unit price$970K$975K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%2.09%
Gross rental yield (units)5.57%-
1-year house growth--5.5%
3-year house growth-+5.1%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population36612,363

La Perouse vs Lane Cove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.2M in La Perouse and $3.2M in Lane Cove, so Lane Cove is the cheaper entry point, with La Perouse houses about 1% dearer.

For units, La Perouse sits at a median of $970K against $975K in Lane Cove, which makes La Perouse the more affordable unit market and Lane Cove the pricier one.

On cash flow, La Perouse leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.73%, compared with 2.09% in Lane Cove, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Lane Cove and 1.4% in La Perouse, so landlords in Lane Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lane Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,363 against 366, roughly 34 times the size of La Perouse; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: La Perouse for rental income, Lane Cove for a lower purchase price, Lane Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison