Skip to main content

La Perouse vs Wareemba

Property investment comparison - La Perouse, NSW 2036 vs Wareemba, NSW 2046

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: La Perouse wins 3, Wareemba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLa PerouseWareemba
Median house price$3.2M$3.3M
Median unit price$970K$1.5M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%2.02%
Gross rental yield (units)5.57%-
1-year house growth-+7.9%
3-year house growth-+4.1%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population3661,519

La Perouse vs Wareemba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.2M in La Perouse and $3.3M in Wareemba, so La Perouse is the cheaper entry point, with Wareemba houses about 1% dearer.

For units, La Perouse sits at a median of $970K against $1.5M in Wareemba, which makes La Perouse the more affordable unit market and Wareemba the pricier one.

On cash flow, La Perouse leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.73%, compared with 2.02% in Wareemba, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Wareemba and 1.4% in La Perouse, so landlords in Wareemba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wareemba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,519 against 366, roughly 4.2 times the size of La Perouse; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: La Perouse for rental income, La Perouse for a lower purchase price, Wareemba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison