Laharum vs Thomson
Property investment comparison - Laharum, VIC 3401 vs Thomson, VIC 3219
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Laharum wins 1, Thomson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Laharum | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $610K | $610K |
| Median unit price | $215K | $520K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.21% | 4.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.16% | 4.25% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 0.8% |
| Population | 162 | 1,606 |
Laharum vs Thomson: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $610K in Laharum and $610K in Thomson.
For units, Laharum sits at a median of $215K against $520K in Thomson, which makes Laharum the more affordable unit market and Thomson the pricier one.
On cash flow, Thomson leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.21% in Laharum, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.
Thomson is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,606 against 162, roughly 10 times the size of Laharum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Thomson for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison