Skip to main content

Lake Bolac vs Maffra

Property investment comparison - Lake Bolac, VIC 3351 vs Maffra, VIC 3860

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lake Bolac wins 2, Maffra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLake BolacMaffra
Median house price$495K$500K
Median unit price$365K$360K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.64%4.98%
Gross rental yield (units)3.99%-
1-year house growth-+12.5%
3-year house growth-+10.6%
Vacancy rate2.8%1.5%
Population3685,384

Lake Bolac vs Maffra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $495K in Lake Bolac and $500K in Maffra, so Lake Bolac is the cheaper entry point, with Maffra houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Lake Bolac sits at a median of $365K against $360K in Maffra, which makes Maffra the more affordable unit market and Lake Bolac the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lake Bolac leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.64%, compared with 4.98% in Maffra, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Maffra and 2.8% in Lake Bolac, so landlords in Maffra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maffra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,384 against 368, roughly 15 times the size of Lake Bolac; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lake Bolac for rental income, Lake Bolac for a lower purchase price, Maffra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison