Skip to main content

Lake Gardens vs Mickleham

Property investment comparison - Lake Gardens, VIC 3355 vs Mickleham, VIC 3064

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lake Gardens wins 2, Mickleham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLake GardensMickleham
Median house price$710K$710K
Median unit price-$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.64%4.02%
Gross rental yield (units)2.51%4.19%
1-year house growth+8.1%estimate+4.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.2%3.8%
Population1,80117,452

Lake Gardens vs Mickleham: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $710K in Lake Gardens and $710K in Mickleham.

On cash flow, Mickleham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.02%, compared with 3.64% in Lake Gardens, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.1% in Lake Gardens (an estimate) and +4.7% in Mickleham (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lake Gardens, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Lake Gardens and 3.8% in Mickleham, so landlords in Lake Gardens face less competition for tenants.

Mickleham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,452 against 1,801, roughly 10 times the size of Lake Gardens; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mickleham for rental income, Lake Gardens for recent price momentum, Lake Gardens for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison