Skip to main content

Lake Illawarra vs Toukley

Property investment comparison - Lake Illawarra, NSW 2528 vs Toukley, NSW 2263

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lake Illawarra wins 2, Toukley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLake IllawarraToukley
Median house price$935K$935K
Median unit price-$590K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.67%3.22%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.50%
1-year house growth+6.7%+11.4%
3-year house growth+25.4%+19.2%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population3,2884,557

Lake Illawarra vs Toukley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $935K in Lake Illawarra and $935K in Toukley.

On cash flow, Lake Illawarra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.67%, compared with 3.22% in Toukley, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.7% in Lake Illawarra and +11.4% in Toukley, so recent momentum favours Toukley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lake Illawarra houses are +25.4% and Toukley houses +19.2%, so Lake Illawarra has compounded faster than Toukley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Toukley and 1.4% in Lake Illawarra, so landlords in Toukley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Toukley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,557 against 3,288, larger than Lake Illawarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lake Illawarra for rental income, Toukley for recent price momentum, Toukley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison