Skip to main content

Lakelands vs Ravenswood

Property investment comparison - Lakelands, WA 6180 vs Ravenswood, WA 6208

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakelands wins 2, Ravenswood wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakelandsRavenswood
Median house price$800K$805K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.55%
1-year house growth+17.6%+22.4%
3-year house growth+69.5%+77.0%
Vacancy rate3.8%2.4%
Population6,1712,483

Lakelands vs Ravenswood: what the numbers say

The median house price is $800K in Lakelands and $805K in Ravenswood, so Lakelands is the cheaper entry point, with Ravenswood houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Lakelands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 4.10% in Ravenswood, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Lakelands and +22.4% in Ravenswood, so recent momentum favours Ravenswood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lakelands houses are +69.5% and Ravenswood houses +77.0%, so Ravenswood has compounded faster than Lakelands over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Ravenswood and 3.8% in Lakelands, so landlords in Ravenswood face less competition for tenants.

Lakelands is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,171 against 2,483, roughly 2.5 times the size of Ravenswood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lakelands for rental income, Lakelands for a lower purchase price, Ravenswood for recent price momentum, Ravenswood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison