Skip to main content

Lakelands vs Warnbro

Property investment comparison - Lakelands, WA 6180 vs Warnbro, WA 6169

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lakelands wins 1, Warnbro wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLakelandsWarnbro
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price-$485K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+17.6%+19.7%estimate
3-year house growth+69.5%-
Vacancy rate3.8%1.1%
Population6,17110,828

Lakelands vs Warnbro: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Lakelands and $800K in Warnbro.

On cash flow, Lakelands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 4.10% in Warnbro, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Lakelands and +19.7% in Warnbro (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Warnbro, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Warnbro and 3.8% in Lakelands, so landlords in Warnbro face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warnbro is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,828 against 6,171, larger than Lakelands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lakelands for rental income, Warnbro for recent price momentum, Warnbro for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison